1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1475 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Cadillac | Tata |
| Model | 62 | Nano |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 37 L |
