1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2010 Toyota Highlander.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1835 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4785 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 73 L |