1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Passat
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Passat is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Passat. (139 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Passat. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Passat weights approximately 277 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volkswagen Passat | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | 62 | Passat |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2307 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |