1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2011 Dodge Durango is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Durango (290 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Dodge Durango weights approximately 127 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2157 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1801 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3043 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 93 L |
