1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Ford F-350
To start off, 2011 Ford F-350 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | F-350 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 132 L |
