1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2011 Ford Falcon is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 318 kg more than 2011 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | LPG |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1757 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4955 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2838 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |
