1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2011 Jeep Wrangler. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 118 kg more than 2011 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1957 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 85 L |