1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 66 kg more than 2011 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1964 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 76 L |
