1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
