1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 525 kg more than 2012 Ford C-Max. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2788 mm |
