1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Jaguar XF. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XF |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |