1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Kia Optima. (200 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 621 kg more than 2012 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Kia Optima | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Optima |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1454 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4844 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2797 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |