1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Audi A5
To start off, 2013 Audi A5 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 208 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2013 Audi A5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | 62 | A5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | rear |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4626 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2751 mm |
