1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (301 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 340 kg more than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1449 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |