1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DURANGO (355 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DURANGO should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 343 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | DURANGO |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2418 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3042 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 93 L |