1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | XJ |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1795 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3032 mm |