1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 236 kg more than 2013 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |