1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 635 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | 62 | Evora |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |