1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (245 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | C |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 245 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4591 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2008 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1445 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
