1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL (613 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 405 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | SL |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 613 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4633 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2099 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2585 mm |
