1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2013 Nissan Titan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Titan (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Titan weights approximately 139 kg more than 1964 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Titan |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 313 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2075 kg | 2214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5704 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2019 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1895 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 106 L |