1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (71 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Smart |
| Model | 62 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
