1964 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sienna is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sienna (262 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2013 Toyota Sienna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Sienna |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 262 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1985 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1811 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 79 L |
