1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1964 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1192 kg more than 1952 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | DeVille | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1964 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1580 mm |