1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1953 Holden FX
To start off, 1964 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1953 Holden FX | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | FX |
Year Released | 1964 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |