1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1964 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1212 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Cadillac | Reliant |
Model | DeVille | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1964 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 798 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 38 L |