1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 1980 Mazda 929 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 896 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 929 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 65 L |