1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1983 Renault 5
To start off, 1983 Renault 5 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1983 Renault 5. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1038 kg more than 1983 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1983 Renault 5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | DeVille | 5 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 51 L |
