1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 587 kg more than 1996 Lancia Kappa.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Lancia Kappa | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | DeVille | Kappa |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2387 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1840 mm |