1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Musso is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 SsangYong Musso (217 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 35 kg more than 1996 SsangYong Musso.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
Model | DeVille | Musso |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |