1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 905 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | SW-X |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |
