1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 303 kg more than 1964 Cadillac DeVille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Econoline |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 213 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2020 mm |