1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1999 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 1999 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (573 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 996 kg more than 1999 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1999 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | DeVille | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3504 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 573 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2690 mm |