1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 105 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | DeVille | SUW |
Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 74 L |