1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Ford Puma

To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2000 Ford Puma. (153 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 735 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Cadillac DeVille 2000 Ford Puma
Make Cadillac Ford
Model DeVille Puma
Year Released 1964 2000
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 1679 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 7000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2010 kg 1275 kg
Vehicle Length 5680 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 79 L 42 L