1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 432 kg more than 2001 Jaguar XJ220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | DeVille | XJ220 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2230 mm |