1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2001 Lada Roadster
To start off, 2001 Lada Roadster is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2001 Lada Roadster. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2001 Lada Roadster.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lada Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2001 Lada Roadster | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | DeVille | Roadster |
Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |