1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna

To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 591 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Cadillac DeVille 2003 Mitsubishi Magna
Make Cadillac Mitsubishi
Model DeVille Magna
Year Released 1964 2003
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 2971 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 2046 kg 1455 kg
Vehicle Length 5680 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2730 mm