1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2005 Skoda Octavia is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 887 kg more than 2005 Skoda Octavia.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
| Model | DeVille | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1780 mm |
