1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1008 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | Tribute |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1840 mm |