1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2008 Lada 21
To start off, 2008 Lada 21 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2008 Lada 21. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2008 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 915 kg more than 2008 Lada 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lada 21, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2008 Lada 21 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | DeVille | 21 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 80 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 43 L |