1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | DeVille | LR2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2180 mm |