1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | DeVille | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2685 mm |
