1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2012 Renault Latitude
To start off, 2012 Renault Latitude is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Latitude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2012 Renault Latitude | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | DeVille | Latitude |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4897 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1832 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |