1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 98 kg more than 2013 Cadillac XTS.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | DeVille | XTS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2831 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 76 L |