1964 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 669 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | DeVille | Compass |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2142 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1811 mm |
