1964 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 980 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Eldorado | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | Eldorado | Munga |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 31 L |
