1964 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 945 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Eldorado | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | 626 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |