1964 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2000 Ford 24.7
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 882 kg more than 2000 Ford 24.7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Cadillac Eldorado | 2000 Ford 24.7 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Eldorado | 24.7 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |