1964 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 350 kg more than 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Cadillac Eldorado | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | Eldorado | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5690 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
